Givebutter vs Qgiv
Givebutter vs Qgiv, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Givebutter is on 61/100 and Qgiv on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Givebutter
- our overall score: 61/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 38/100
- LinkedIn following: 34,005 against 23,425
Qgiv
- headcount: 579 against 164
At a glance
| Measure | Givebutter | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A fundraising platform for nonprofits, offering tools for donations, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns. | Online fundraising and donor management platform for nonprofits. |
| Category | Not published | Nonprofit Software, Fundraising Software, Donor Management, CRM |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Philadelphia, USA | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Givebutter | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 164 | 579 |
| Total funding | $57.3M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,005 | 23,425 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Givebutter | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Givebutter | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Givebutter vs Qgiv: common questions
Which is better, Givebutter or Qgiv?
On our 0-100 score Givebutter rates higher (61/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Givebutter and Qgiv compare on the numbers?
Givebutter leads on our overall score (61/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 38/100), LinkedIn following (34,005 against 23,425). Qgiv leads on headcount (579 against 164).
Read the full Givebutter review and pricing or the Qgiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Givebutter alternatives we track.