GitHub Advanced Security vs SentinelOne

GitHub Advanced Security vs SentinelOne, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GitHub Advanced Security is on 22/100 and SentinelOne on 76/100.

GitHub Advanced Security logo
GitHub Advanced SecurityGitHub's suite of security tools for code scanning, secret detection, and dependency review.
Try GitHub Advanced Security
SentinelOne logo
SentinelOneSentinelOne delivers autonomous cybersecurity through its AI-powered Singularity Platform, protecting endpoints, cloud workloads, and identities.
Try SentinelOne

Where each one leads

GitHub Advanced Security

  • domain rating: 97/100 against 83/100
  • headcount: 6,356 against 3,198
  • LinkedIn following: 6,217,223 against 399,270

SentinelOne

  • our overall score: 76/100 against 22/100
  • agent readiness: 54/100 against 45/100

At a glance

MeasureGitHub Advanced SecuritySentinelOne
What it isGitHub's suite of security tools for code scanning, secret detection, and dependency review.SentinelOne delivers autonomous cybersecurity through its AI-powered Singularity Platform, protecting endpoints, cloud workloads, and identities.
CategoryCybersecurity, DevSecOps, Threat Detection, Code ScanningCybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security, Identity & Access
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingPlatformPlatform
FoundedNot published2013
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesMountain View, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureGitHub Advanced SecuritySentinelOne
Employees6,3563,198
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published+15.6%
Total fundingNot published$800M
ValuationNot published$10B
LinkedIn followers6,217,223399,270

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureGitHub Advanced SecuritySentinelOne
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating22/10076/100
Traction20/10060/100
TeamNot published70/100
Search visibility34/10063/100
QualityNot published88/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (45/100)D (54/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10097/10083/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureGitHub Advanced SecuritySentinelOne
HostingNot detectedVercel
CDNNot detectedCloudflare
FrameworksNot detectedNext.js
AnalyticsNot detectedGoogle Tag Manager
Open sourceYesNo

What users say

MeasureGitHub Advanced SecuritySentinelOne
Reddit sentimentThreads we track2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threadsNot published
GitHub Advanced Security
Just wanted to share a great free opportunity from GitHub for anyone How it works: Step 1: Complete 3 GitHub Skills courses (each ~1 hour) Step 2: Submit the Completion Form After finishing all three, fill out the official form to share you
r/devops

GitHub Advanced Security vs SentinelOne: common questions

Which is better, GitHub Advanced Security or SentinelOne?

On our 0-100 score SentinelOne rates higher (76/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do GitHub Advanced Security and SentinelOne compare on the numbers?

GitHub Advanced Security leads on domain rating (97/100 against 83/100), headcount (6,356 against 3,198), LinkedIn following (6,217,223 against 399,270). SentinelOne leads on our overall score (76/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 45/100).

What do real users say about GitHub Advanced Security and SentinelOne?

GitHub Advanced Security: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.

Read the full GitHub Advanced Security review and pricing or the SentinelOne review and pricing. You can also browse other GitHub Advanced Security alternatives we track.