Giskard vs QueryStory
Giskard vs QueryStory, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Giskard is on 60/100 and QueryStory on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Giskard
- our overall score: 60/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 9/100
QueryStory
- funding raised: $6.0M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Giskard | QueryStory |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Europe's first independent sovereign guardrail platform for enterprise AI agents. | QueryStory is an agentic data platform that helps enterprises turn data into trusted decisions and action by making AI queries coherent and trustworthy. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Enterprise Software, Sovereign AI | Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics, Cybersecurity, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Giskard | QueryStory |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 23 | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $6.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $60.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,743 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Giskard | QueryStory |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 34/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 9/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Giskard | QueryStory |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Giskard vs QueryStory: common questions
Which is better, Giskard or QueryStory?
On our 0-100 score Giskard rates higher (60/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Giskard and QueryStory compare on the numbers?
Giskard leads on our overall score (60/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 40/100), domain rating (66/100 against 9/100). QueryStory leads on funding raised ($6.0M against $2.5M).
Read the full Giskard review and pricing or the QueryStory review and pricing. You can also browse other Giskard alternatives we track.