Giraffe 360 vs Matterport
Giraffe 360 vs Matterport, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Giraffe 360 is on 55/100 and Matterport on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Giraffe 360
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Matterport
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 79/100
- headcount: 531 against 172
- funding raised: $198M against $26.0M
- LinkedIn following: 74,493 against 12,585
At a glance
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A real estate photography and virtual tour platform. | Matterport provides a spatial data platform that turns physical spaces into immersive 3D digital twins. |
| Category | Real Estate, Proptech, Photography, Virtual Tours | Spatial Computing, Digital Twin, 3D Modeling, Virtual Tours |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Riga, Latvia | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 172 | 531 |
| Total funding | $26.0M | $198M |
| Latest round | Series B | SPAC |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $2.9B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,585 | 74,493 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
What users say
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I've used their Go cam and it shoots decent stills and panos (after the processing update this year). The PRO cam looks like the same optics/sensor but with a stronger LIDAR strapped on. Honestly, the backend looks like where the actual mag”r/RealEstatePhotography
Giraffe 360 vs Matterport: common questions
Which is better, Giraffe 360 or Matterport?
On our 0-100 score Giraffe 360 rates higher (55/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Giraffe 360 and Matterport compare on the numbers?
Matterport leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 30/100), domain rating (92/100 against 79/100), headcount (531 against 172), funding raised ($198M against $26.0M), LinkedIn following (74,493 against 12,585).
What do real users say about Giraffe 360 and Matterport?
Giraffe 360: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/RealEstatePhotography.
Read the full Giraffe 360 review and pricing or the Matterport review and pricing. You can also browse other Giraffe 360 alternatives we track.