Giraffe 360 vs Los Angeles Project
Giraffe 360 vs Los Angeles Project, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Giraffe 360 is on 55/100 and Los Angeles Project on 8/100.
Where each one leads
Giraffe 360
- our overall score: 55/100 against 8/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 172 against 1
Los Angeles Project
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Los Angeles Project |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A real estate photography and virtual tour platform. | A lifestyle and documentary photo project by photographer Rocco Ceselin. |
| Category | Real Estate, Proptech, Photography, Virtual Tours | Photography, Documentary Photography, Lifestyle Photography, Art |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Riga, Latvia | Los Angeles, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Los Angeles Project |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 172 | 1 |
| Total funding | $26.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,585 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Los Angeles Project |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 8/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 3/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Los Angeles Project |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
What users say
| Measure | Giraffe 360 | Los Angeles Project |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I've used their Go cam and it shoots decent stills and panos (after the processing update this year). The PRO cam looks like the same optics/sensor but with a stronger LIDAR strapped on. Honestly, the backend looks like where the actual mag”r/RealEstatePhotography
Giraffe 360 vs Los Angeles Project: common questions
Which is better, Giraffe 360 or Los Angeles Project?
On our 0-100 score Giraffe 360 rates higher (55/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Giraffe 360 and Los Angeles Project compare on the numbers?
Giraffe 360 leads on our overall score (55/100 against 8/100), domain rating (79/100 against 5/100), headcount (172 against 1).
What do real users say about Giraffe 360 and Los Angeles Project?
Giraffe 360: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/RealEstatePhotography.
Read the full Giraffe 360 review and pricing or the Los Angeles Project review and pricing. You can also browse other Giraffe 360 alternatives we track.