Gigantic vs StreamElements
Gigantic vs StreamElements, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gigantic is on 58/100 and StreamElements on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Gigantic
- agent readiness: 27/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 200 against 63
- headcount growth: +67.1% against -26.7%
StreamElements
- our overall score: 68/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $111M against $16.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,821 against 8,462
At a glance
| Measure | Gigantic | StreamElements |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Transforms arcade games into live, mobile-playable experiences. | Platform for livestream tools, monetization, audience engagement, and influencer marketing. |
| Category | Gaming, Arcade Games, Mobile Gaming, Live Streaming | Gaming, Media, Live Streaming, Monetization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gigantic | StreamElements |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 200 | 63 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +67.1% | -26.7% |
| Total funding | $16.0M | $111M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $450M |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,462 | 14,821 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gigantic | StreamElements |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 21/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gigantic | StreamElements |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | Gigantic | StreamElements |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
Gigantic vs StreamElements: common questions
Which is better, Gigantic or StreamElements?
On our 0-100 score StreamElements rates higher (68/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gigantic and StreamElements compare on the numbers?
Gigantic leads on agent readiness (27/100 against 21/100), headcount (200 against 63), headcount growth (+67.1% against -26.7%). StreamElements leads on our overall score (68/100 against 58/100), domain rating (80/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($111M against $16.0M), LinkedIn following (14,821 against 8,462).
Read the full Gigantic review and pricing or the StreamElements review and pricing. You can also browse other Gigantic alternatives we track.