GI Dynamics vs mediQ
GI Dynamics vs mediQ, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GI Dynamics is on 55/100 and mediQ on 54/100.
Where each one leads
GI Dynamics
- funding raised: $130M against $7.8M
mediQ
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 1,372 against 57
- LinkedIn following: 30,743 against 3,815
At a glance
| Measure | GI Dynamics | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a minimally invasive implantable device for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity. | Global healthcare and homecare partner providing medical devices, products, and innovative solutions. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Diabetes Treatment | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Homecare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Lexington, United States | Utrecht, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GI Dynamics | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 57 | 1,372 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -11.1% |
| Total funding | $130M | $7.8M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,815 | 30,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GI Dynamics | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GI Dynamics | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
GI Dynamics vs mediQ: common questions
Which is better, GI Dynamics or mediQ?
On our 0-100 score GI Dynamics rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GI Dynamics and mediQ compare on the numbers?
GI Dynamics leads on funding raised ($130M against $7.8M). mediQ leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 30/100), domain rating (38/100 against 31/100), headcount (1,372 against 57), LinkedIn following (30,743 against 3,815).
Read the full GI Dynamics review and pricing or the mediQ review and pricing. You can also browse other GI Dynamics alternatives we track.