GFL Environmental vs WCA Waste Corporation
GFL Environmental vs WCA Waste Corporation, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GFL Environmental is on 29/100 and WCA Waste Corporation on 24/100.
Where each one leads
GFL Environmental
- our overall score: 29/100 against 24/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $4.0B against $1.7B
WCA Waste Corporation
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | GFL Environmental | WCA Waste Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. | A vertically integrated, non-hazardous solid waste management company providing collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services. |
| Category | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services | Waste Management, Environmental Services, Recycling, Solid Waste Disposal |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Vaughan, Canada | Houston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GFL Environmental | WCA Waste Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,244 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $1.7B |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | 173,203 | 173,203 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | WCA Waste Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 24/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | WCA Waste Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
GFL Environmental vs WCA Waste Corporation: common questions
Which is better, GFL Environmental or WCA Waste Corporation?
On our 0-100 score GFL Environmental rates higher (29/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GFL Environmental and WCA Waste Corporation compare on the numbers?
GFL Environmental leads on our overall score (29/100 against 24/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($4.0B against $1.7B).
Read the full GFL Environmental review and pricing or the WCA Waste Corporation review and pricing. You can also browse other GFL Environmental alternatives we track.