GFL Environmental vs Waste Connections
GFL Environmental vs Waste Connections, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GFL Environmental is on 29/100 and Waste Connections on 67/100.
Where each one leads
GFL Environmental
- funding raised: $4.0B against $600M
Waste Connections
- our overall score: 67/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 22,000 against 8,244
At a glance
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Waste Connections |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. | A leading provider of solid waste collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services. |
| Category | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services | Waste Management, Environmental Services, Industrial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2007 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | Vaughan, Canada | Austin, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Waste Connections |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,244 | 22,000 |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $600M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 173,203 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Waste Connections |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Waste Connections |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
GFL Environmental vs Waste Connections: common questions
Which is better, GFL Environmental or Waste Connections?
On our 0-100 score Waste Connections rates higher (67/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GFL Environmental and Waste Connections compare on the numbers?
GFL Environmental leads on funding raised ($4.0B against $600M). Waste Connections leads on our overall score (67/100 against 29/100), headcount (22,000 against 8,244).
Read the full GFL Environmental review and pricing or the Waste Connections review and pricing. You can also browse other GFL Environmental alternatives we track.