GFL Environmental vs Urbanscrap
GFL Environmental vs Urbanscrap, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GFL Environmental is on 29/100 and Urbanscrap on 6/100.
Where each one leads
GFL Environmental
- our overall score: 29/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
Urbanscrap
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Urbanscrap |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. | Urbanscrap is a platform that helps businesses manage and optimize their waste and recycling processes. |
| Category | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services | Waste Management, Recycling, Sustainability, Environmental Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2007 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Vaughan, Canada | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Urbanscrap |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,244 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.0B | Not published |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 173,203 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Urbanscrap |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 6/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Urbanscrap |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
GFL Environmental vs Urbanscrap: common questions
Which is better, GFL Environmental or Urbanscrap?
On our 0-100 score GFL Environmental rates higher (29/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GFL Environmental and Urbanscrap compare on the numbers?
GFL Environmental leads on our overall score (29/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100).
Read the full GFL Environmental review and pricing or the Urbanscrap review and pricing. You can also browse other GFL Environmental alternatives we track.