GFL Environmental vs Suez
GFL Environmental vs Suez, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GFL Environmental is on 29/100 and Suez on 23/100.
Where each one leads
GFL Environmental
- our overall score: 29/100 against 23/100
Suez
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 26,270 against 8,244
- LinkedIn following: 909,509 against 173,203
At a glance
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Suez |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. | Global leader in water and waste management services. |
| Category | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services | Water Treatment, Waste Management, Environmental Services, Circular Economy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2G |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2007 | 1858 |
| Headquarters | Vaughan, Canada | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Suez |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,244 | 26,270 |
| Total funding | $1.6B | Not published |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 173,203 | 909,509 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Suez |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 23/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GFL Environmental | Suez |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
GFL Environmental vs Suez: common questions
Which is better, GFL Environmental or Suez?
On our 0-100 score GFL Environmental rates higher (29/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GFL Environmental and Suez compare on the numbers?
GFL Environmental leads on our overall score (29/100 against 23/100). Suez leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), headcount (26,270 against 8,244), LinkedIn following (909,509 against 173,203).
Read the full GFL Environmental review and pricing or the Suez review and pricing. You can also browse other GFL Environmental alternatives we track.