Gett vs HQ
Gett vs HQ, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gett is on 54/100 and HQ on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Gett
- domain rating: 70/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 852 against 174
- funding raised: $795M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 55,257 against 7,485
HQ
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 25/100
- headcount growth: +29.6% against -0.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Gett | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gett is a mobility technology company focused on solving complex urban transportation challenges with innovative solutions. | Enterprise solution for corporate ground transportation booking, billing, and payment. |
| Category | Mobility, Transportation, Ridesharing, Fleet Management | Mobility, Ride Service, Route Optimization, Travel Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gett | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 852 | 174 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.4% | +29.6% |
| Total funding | $795M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Strategic |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 55,257 | 7,485 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gett | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gett | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Gett vs HQ: common questions
Which is better, Gett or HQ?
On our 0-100 score HQ rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gett and HQ compare on the numbers?
Gett leads on domain rating (70/100 against 29/100), headcount (852 against 174), funding raised ($795M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (55,257 against 7,485). HQ leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 25/100), headcount growth (+29.6% against -0.4%).
Read the full Gett review and pricing or the HQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Gett alternatives we track.