GeoX vs Mantis Vision
GeoX vs Mantis Vision, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GeoX is on 57/100 and Mantis Vision on 49/100.
Where each one leads
GeoX
- our overall score: 57/100 against 49/100
- headcount growth: +31.7% against -8.8%
Mantis Vision
- domain rating: 30/100 against 3/100
- funding raised: $77.2M against $33.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,713 against 3,975
At a glance
| Measure | GeoX | Mantis Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates 3D object extraction from aerial imagery for property data databases. | Mantis Vision develops high-quality, user-friendly 3D capturing technologies for various applications and markets. |
| Category | 3D, Insurance, Aerial, Proptech | 3D, Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), 3D Capturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GeoX | Mantis Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 37 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.7% | -8.8% |
| Total funding | $33.0M | $77.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,975 | 5,713 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GeoX | Mantis Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 3/100 | 30/100 |
GeoX vs Mantis Vision: common questions
Which is better, GeoX or Mantis Vision?
On our 0-100 score GeoX rates higher (57/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GeoX and Mantis Vision compare on the numbers?
GeoX leads on our overall score (57/100 against 49/100), headcount growth (+31.7% against -8.8%). Mantis Vision leads on domain rating (30/100 against 3/100), funding raised ($77.2M against $33.0M), LinkedIn following (5,713 against 3,975).
Read the full GeoX review and pricing or the Mantis Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other GeoX alternatives we track.