Geoquant vs OpenGamma
Geoquant vs OpenGamma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Geoquant is on 50/100 and OpenGamma on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Geoquant
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 58/100
OpenGamma
- our overall score: 60/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 51 against 14
- funding raised: $10.0M against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 43,803 against 3,526
At a glance
| Measure | Geoquant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform fusing political science and computer science to price real-time political risk for global investors. | Provides a cloud-native platform for risk analytics and derivatives trading for financial institutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Politics, Intelligence, Geopolitical Risk | Fintech, Risk Management, Derivatives Trading, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Geoquant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 51 |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,526 | 43,803 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Geoquant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Geoquant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Netlify |
| CDN | CloudFront | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Geoquant vs OpenGamma: common questions
Which is better, Geoquant or OpenGamma?
On our 0-100 score OpenGamma rates higher (60/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Geoquant and OpenGamma compare on the numbers?
Geoquant leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 41/100), domain rating (71/100 against 58/100). OpenGamma leads on our overall score (60/100 against 50/100), headcount (51 against 14), funding raised ($10.0M against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (43,803 against 3,526).
Read the full Geoquant review and pricing or the OpenGamma review and pricing. You can also browse other Geoquant alternatives we track.