Gem Security vs Mitiga
Gem Security vs Mitiga, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gem Security is on 61/100 and Mitiga on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Gem Security
- domain rating: 84/100 against 56/100
Mitiga
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 78 against 25
- headcount growth: -1.9% against -24.1%
- funding raised: $52.0M against $34.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,822 against 5,851
At a glance
| Measure | Gem Security | Mitiga |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native threat detection, investigation, and response platform for enterprise security. | Cloud and SaaS Incident Response Automation platform for continuous threat hunting and investigation. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gem Security | Mitiga |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25 | 78 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -24.1% | -1.9% |
| Total funding | $34.0M | $52.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $100M |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,851 | 12,822 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gem Security | Mitiga |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gem Security | Mitiga |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Gem Security vs Mitiga: common questions
Which is better, Gem Security or Mitiga?
On our 0-100 score Mitiga rates higher (64/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gem Security and Mitiga compare on the numbers?
Gem Security leads on domain rating (84/100 against 56/100). Mitiga leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 45/100), headcount (78 against 25), headcount growth (-1.9% against -24.1%), funding raised ($52.0M against $34.0M), LinkedIn following (12,822 against 5,851).
Read the full Gem Security review and pricing or the Mitiga review and pricing. You can also browse other Gem Security alternatives we track.