GE HealthCare vs iCAD
GE HealthCare vs iCAD, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GE HealthCare is on 21/100 and iCAD on 55/100.
Where each one leads
GE HealthCare
- domain rating: 81/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 60,162 against 353
- LinkedIn following: 2,910,147 against 15,268
iCAD
- our overall score: 55/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | GE HealthCare | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global medical technology, diagnostics, and digital solutions innovator, providing integrated solutions for precision health. | AI-powered cancer detection and therapy solutions for early diagnosis and personalized risk assessment. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Imaging, Ultrasound | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | Nashua, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GE HealthCare | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 60,162 | 353 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +26.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $37.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Direct Offering |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,910,147 | 15,268 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GE HealthCare | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GE HealthCare | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
GE HealthCare vs iCAD: common questions
Which is better, GE HealthCare or iCAD?
On our 0-100 score iCAD rates higher (55/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GE HealthCare and iCAD compare on the numbers?
GE HealthCare leads on domain rating (81/100 against 53/100), headcount (60,162 against 353), LinkedIn following (2,910,147 against 15,268). iCAD leads on our overall score (55/100 against 21/100).
Read the full GE HealthCare review and pricing or the iCAD review and pricing. You can also browse other GE HealthCare alternatives we track.