Gamma vs Pitch
Gamma vs Pitch, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gamma is on 66/100 and Pitch on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Gamma
- our overall score: 66/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 272 against 74
- funding raised: $148M against $73.0M
- LinkedIn following: 96,885 against 37,679
Pitch
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI design partner for creating presentations, websites, social media, and more at the speed of thought. | Collaborative pitch deck and presentation software for modern teams. |
| Category | AI, Generative AI, Presentation Software, Website Builder | Presentation Software, Collaboration Tools, Productivity Software, Sales Enablement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 272 | 74 |
| Total funding | $148M | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $2K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 96,885 | 37,679 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 54/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI-Powered Design, Content Creation, Customizable Templates, Social Media Integration, Text-to-Design Conversion, Collaboration Tools | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Gamma | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Gamma vs Pitch: common questions
Which is better, Gamma or Pitch?
On our 0-100 score Gamma rates higher (66/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gamma and Pitch compare on the numbers?
Gamma leads on our overall score (66/100 against 62/100), headcount (272 against 74), funding raised ($148M against $73.0M), LinkedIn following (96,885 against 37,679). Pitch leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 42/100).
Read the full Gamma review and pricing or the Pitch review and pricing. You can also browse other Gamma alternatives we track.