Gambling.com vs Trackonomics
Gambling.com vs Trackonomics, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gambling.com is on 60/100 and Trackonomics on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Gambling.com
- our overall score: 60/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 523 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 23,861 against 1,306
Trackonomics
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gambling.com | Trackonomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A performance marketing and sports betting media company providing digital marketing services for the online gambling industry. | Trackonomics is an enterprise-level aggregation and automation platform for performance marketers, providing data, insights, and control for affiliate marketing. |
| Category | Performance Marketing, Affiliate Marketing, Online Gambling, Sports Betting Media | Marketing, Analytics, Affiliate Marketing, Performance Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Valletta, Malta | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gambling.com | Trackonomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 523 | 5 |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.4M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,861 | 1,306 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gambling.com | Trackonomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gambling.com | Trackonomics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Gambling.com vs Trackonomics: common questions
Which is better, Gambling.com or Trackonomics?
On our 0-100 score Gambling.com rates higher (60/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gambling.com and Trackonomics compare on the numbers?
Gambling.com leads on our overall score (60/100 against 44/100), headcount (523 against 5), LinkedIn following (23,861 against 1,306). Trackonomics leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 34/100), domain rating (50/100 against 36/100).
Read the full Gambling.com review and pricing or the Trackonomics review and pricing. You can also browse other Gambling.com alternatives we track.