Gambit Security vs Eon
Gambit Security vs Eon, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gambit Security is on 50/100 and Eon on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Gambit Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Eon
- our overall score: 71/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $997M against $56.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Gambit Security | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI platform for automated data loss prevention and recovery resilience. | Eon provides a cloud backup posture management platform that automates backups and transforms them into usable assets for AI and analytics. |
| Category | Data Protection, Cybersecurity, Data Recovery, Backup Solutions | Enterprise, Cloud, Cloud Backup Posture Management (CBPM), Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2026 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gambit Security | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 186 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +218.8% |
| Total funding | $56.0M | $997M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 170 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gambit Security | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | C (62/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gambit Security | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Zendesk |
Gambit Security vs Eon: common questions
Which is better, Gambit Security or Eon?
On our 0-100 score Eon rates higher (71/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gambit Security and Eon compare on the numbers?
Eon leads on our overall score (71/100 against 50/100), domain rating (62/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($997M against $56.0M).
Read the full Gambit Security review and pricing or the Eon review and pricing. You can also browse other Gambit Security alternatives we track.

