Galooli vs Sitetracker
Galooli vs Sitetracker, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Galooli is on 19/100 and Sitetracker on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Galooli
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
Sitetracker
- our overall score: 61/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 426 against 151
At a glance
| Measure | Galooli | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Galooli develops advanced hardware and software solutions for seamless and efficient management of remote stationary and mobile assets. | Cloud-native platform for managing critical infrastructure asset lifecycles. |
| Category | Industrial, Energy Management, Energy, Sustainability | Infrastructure Management, Utilities, Renewables, EV Charging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Galooli | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 151 | 426 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 98,888 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Galooli | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Galooli | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vultr | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Galooli | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“$IBDRY Iberdrola Renews and Expands Sitetracker Use to Help Manage Massive EV Charging Station Deployment Goals.”r/EV_Trading_Community
Galooli vs Sitetracker: common questions
Which is better, Galooli or Sitetracker?
On our 0-100 score Sitetracker rates higher (61/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Galooli and Sitetracker compare on the numbers?
Galooli leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100). Sitetracker leads on our overall score (61/100 against 19/100), domain rating (57/100 against 38/100), headcount (426 against 151).
What do real users say about Galooli and Sitetracker?
Sitetracker: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/EV_Trading_Community.
Read the full Galooli review and pricing or the Sitetracker review and pricing. You can also browse other Galooli alternatives we track.