Galaxea vs Uma
Galaxea vs Uma, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Galaxea is on 60/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Galaxea
- funding raised: $590M against $40.0M
Uma
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Galaxea | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing full-stack embodied AI systems, including humanoid robots and foundational AI models for versatile automation. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Embodied AI, AI Foundation & Compute, Foundation Model | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Tokyo, Japan | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Galaxea | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 29 |
| Total funding | $590M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Galaxea | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Galaxea | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Galaxea vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Galaxea or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Galaxea rates higher (60/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Galaxea and Uma compare on the numbers?
Galaxea leads on funding raised ($590M against $40.0M). Uma leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), domain rating (36/100 against 25/100).
Read the full Galaxea review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Galaxea alternatives we track.