Fyve By vs NavVis
Fyve By vs NavVis, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fyve By is on 18/100 and NavVis on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Fyve By
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 43/100
NavVis
- our overall score: 66/100 against 18/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 14/100
- headcount: 413 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 55,761 against 3,598
At a glance
| Measure | Fyve By | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Aviation enterprise software for modernizing operations, starting with their Smart Hangar Platform. | NavVis provides a spatial twin platform for the built world, offering reality capture solutions and a browser-based SaaS platform for managing and utilizing spatial data. |
| Category | Airport Management, Aviation Software, Hangar Optimization, FBO Management | Spatial Computing, Digital Twins, Enterprise Software, Industrial Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fyve By | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 413 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,598 | 55,761 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fyve By | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 18/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fyve By | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Matomo |
Fyve By vs NavVis: common questions
Which is better, Fyve By or NavVis?
On our 0-100 score NavVis rates higher (66/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fyve By and NavVis compare on the numbers?
Fyve By leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 43/100). NavVis leads on our overall score (66/100 against 18/100), domain rating (70/100 against 14/100), headcount (413 against 12), LinkedIn following (55,761 against 3,598).
Read the full Fyve By review and pricing or the NavVis review and pricing. You can also browse other Fyve By alternatives we track.