FVMat vs Mobileye
FVMat vs Mobileye, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FVMat is on 26/100 and Mobileye on 78/100.
Where each one leads
FVMat
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 47/100
Mobileye
- our overall score: 78/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 3,779 against 10
- headcount growth: +11.6% against +4.4%
- LinkedIn following: 148,545 against 940
At a glance
| Measure | FVMat | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Deep-tech startup developing dynamic, multi-functional meta-materials using AI and multi-physics simulations for aerospace. | Global leader in autonomous driving technology and ADAS chips, providing vision-based sensing and AI software for vehicles worldwide. |
| Category | Automotive, Aerospace, Simulation, Advanced Manufacturing & Materials | Automotive, Autonomous, Autonomous Vehicles, ADAS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Jerusalem, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FVMat | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 3,779 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.4% | +11.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $515M |
| Latest round | Not published | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 940 | 148,545 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FVMat | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 26/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 55/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FVMat | Mobileye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Nuxt |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
FVMat vs Mobileye: common questions
Which is better, FVMat or Mobileye?
On our 0-100 score Mobileye rates higher (78/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FVMat and Mobileye compare on the numbers?
FVMat leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 47/100). Mobileye leads on our overall score (78/100 against 26/100), domain rating (73/100 against 7/100), headcount (3,779 against 10), headcount growth (+11.6% against +4.4%), LinkedIn following (148,545 against 940).
Read the full FVMat review and pricing or the Mobileye review and pricing. You can also browse other FVMat alternatives we track.