Believer Meats vs Upside Foods
Believer Meats vs Upside Foods, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Believer Meats is on 54/100 and Upside Foods on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Believer Meats
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $388M against $217M
Upside Foods
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 225 against 125
- LinkedIn following: 44,676 against 28,406
At a glance
| Measure | Believer Meats | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cultivated meat company focused on scaling production for global accessibility and affordability. | Develops and produces cultivated meat for consumption, aiming to create a more sustainable food system. |
| Category | Food, Meat, FoodTech, Cellular Agriculture | FoodTech, Cellular Agriculture, Lab-Grown Meat, Sustainable Food |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Food production |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Raleigh, United States | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Believer Meats | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 125 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $388M | $217M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $947M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,406 | 44,676 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Believer Meats | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 65/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Believer Meats | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel |
Believer Meats vs Upside Foods: common questions
Which is better, Believer Meats or Upside Foods?
On our 0-100 score Upside Foods rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Believer Meats and Upside Foods compare on the numbers?
Believer Meats leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($388M against $217M). Upside Foods leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (65/100 against 28/100), headcount (225 against 125), LinkedIn following (44,676 against 28,406).
Read the full Believer Meats review and pricing or the Upside Foods review and pricing. You can also browse other Believer Meats alternatives we track.