Futora vs Thought Machine
Futora vs Thought Machine, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Futora is on 53/100 and Thought Machine on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Futora
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Thought Machine
- our overall score: 57/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 521 against 31
- funding raised: $504M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 74,486 against 2,462
At a glance
| Measure | Futora | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital platform enabling financial institutions to offer tailored, on-the-fly financial products. | Cloud-native core banking platform enabling banks to build and launch new products. |
| Category | Fintech, Investments, Personalized, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Core Banking, Digital Banking, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Futora | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 31 | 521 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 41 |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $504M |
| Latest round | Seed | Undisclosed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,462 | 74,486 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Futora | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Futora | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Futora | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Futora vs Thought Machine: common questions
Which is better, Futora or Thought Machine?
On our 0-100 score Thought Machine rates higher (57/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Futora and Thought Machine compare on the numbers?
Thought Machine leads on our overall score (57/100 against 53/100), domain rating (69/100 against 25/100), headcount (521 against 31), funding raised ($504M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (74,486 against 2,462).
Read the full Futora review and pricing or the Thought Machine review and pricing. You can also browse other Futora alternatives we track.