Futora vs M-KOPA
Futora vs M-KOPA, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Futora is on 53/100 and M-KOPA on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Futora
- headcount growth: +37.2% against +9.6%
M-KOPA
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 3,269 against 31
- funding raised: $325M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 86,854 against 2,462
At a glance
| Measure | Futora | M-KOPA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital platform enabling financial institutions to offer tailored, on-the-fly financial products. | Fintech platform providing affordable smartphones and digital financial services to 'Every Day Earners' in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
| Category | Fintech, Investments, Personalized, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Payments, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Futora | M-KOPA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 31 | 3,269 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.2% | +9.6% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $325M |
| Latest round | Seed | Debt and Equity |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,462 | 86,854 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Futora | M-KOPA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Futora | M-KOPA |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Futora vs M-KOPA: common questions
Which is better, Futora or M-KOPA?
On our 0-100 score M-KOPA rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Futora and M-KOPA compare on the numbers?
Futora leads on headcount growth (+37.2% against +9.6%). M-KOPA leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), domain rating (62/100 against 25/100), headcount (3,269 against 31), funding raised ($325M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (86,854 against 2,462).
Read the full Futora review and pricing or the M-KOPA review and pricing. You can also browse other Futora alternatives we track.