Funding Societies vs StoneCo
Funding Societies vs StoneCo, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Funding Societies is on 46/100 and StoneCo on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Funding Societies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
StoneCo
- our overall score: 67/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 13,867 against 481
- LinkedIn following: 2,482,372 against 142,684
At a glance
| Measure | Funding Societies | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading digital finance platform for SMEs in Southeast Asia, offering loans and payment solutions. | Brazilian fintech providing integrated financial and software solutions for merchants of all sizes. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Funding Societies | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 481 | 13,867 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +3.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Not published | IPO |
| LinkedIn followers | 142,684 | 2,482,372 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Funding Societies | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Funding Societies | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Funding Societies | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 3 negative across 4 threads |
“StoneCo is a fairly dope SA fintech company with quality financials yet rapidly increasing short interest. The dumb fucks who think they can chip away at this little gem deserve to be eaten alive by the intrepid marketeers going in on share”r/wallstreetbets
Funding Societies vs StoneCo: common questions
Which is better, Funding Societies or StoneCo?
On our 0-100 score StoneCo rates higher (67/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Funding Societies and StoneCo compare on the numbers?
StoneCo leads on our overall score (67/100 against 46/100), headcount (13,867 against 481), LinkedIn following (2,482,372 against 142,684).
What do real users say about Funding Societies and StoneCo?
StoneCo: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wallstreetbets.
Read the full Funding Societies review and pricing or the StoneCo review and pricing. You can also browse other Funding Societies alternatives we track.