Fundbox vs Pagaya Investments
Fundbox vs Pagaya Investments, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fundbox is on 70/100 and Pagaya Investments on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Fundbox
- our overall score: 70/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 59/100
- headcount growth: -9.4% against -14.3%
Pagaya Investments
- headcount: 463 against 206
- funding raised: $1.4B against $536M
- LinkedIn following: 70,861 against 23,678
At a glance
| Measure | Fundbox | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Embedded working capital platform for small businesses, offering AI-powered credit lines and B2B payment solutions. | AI-powered network enabling financial institutions to expand customer access and scale lending. |
| Category | Fintech, Credit, Lending, SMB | Fintech, Asset Management, Fixed Income, Credit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Dallas, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fundbox | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 206 | 463 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.4% | -14.3% |
| Total funding | $536M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Series D | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,678 | 70,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fundbox | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fundbox | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Fundbox vs Pagaya Investments: common questions
Which is better, Fundbox or Pagaya Investments?
On our 0-100 score Fundbox rates higher (70/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fundbox and Pagaya Investments compare on the numbers?
Fundbox leads on our overall score (70/100 against 65/100), domain rating (74/100 against 59/100), headcount growth (-9.4% against -14.3%). Pagaya Investments leads on headcount (463 against 206), funding raised ($1.4B against $536M), LinkedIn following (70,861 against 23,678).
Read the full Fundbox review and pricing or the Pagaya Investments review and pricing. You can also browse other Fundbox alternatives we track.