Fundamental vs Scale AI
Fundamental vs Scale AI, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fundamental is on 65/100 and Scale AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Fundamental
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Scale AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 5,925 against 90
- funding raised: $30B against $255M
At a glance
| Measure | Fundamental | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fundamental is an AI company building Large Tabular Models (LTMs) to unlock predictive intelligence from enterprise data. | Scale AI provides data labeling and AI infrastructure services that help organizations build, evaluate, and improve machine learning models. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Large Tabular Model, Predictive Analytics, Enterprise AI | Artificial Intelligence, Data Labeling, ML Infrastructure, AI Training Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2024 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fundamental | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 90 | 5,925 |
| Total funding | $255M | $30B |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $7K |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,884 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fundamental | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 18/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 92/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fundamental | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Fundamental | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Fundamental vs Scale AI: common questions
Which is better, Fundamental or Scale AI?
On our 0-100 score Scale AI rates higher (70/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fundamental and Scale AI compare on the numbers?
Scale AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 65/100), domain rating (78/100 against 37/100), headcount (5,925 against 90), funding raised ($30B against $255M).
Read the full Fundamental review and pricing or the Scale AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Fundamental alternatives we track.