Function Health vs Nest Genomics
Function Health vs Nest Genomics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Function Health is on 55/100 and Nest Genomics on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Function Health
- our overall score: 55/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $298M against $8.5M
Nest Genomics
- headcount: 16 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 1,969 against 152
At a glance
| Measure | Function Health | Nest Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Membership-based service offering 160+ lab tests, doctor insights, and lifetime health tracking. | Platform for providers and patients to integrate genetic information into everyday health. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Longevity, Precision Medicine | Genomics, Healthcare, HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Function Health | Nest Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 16 |
| Total funding | $298M | $8.5M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $3K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 152 | 1,969 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Function Health | Nest Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Function Health | Nest Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Svelte, Astro | Not detected |
| Analytics | Mixpanel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Function Health | Nest Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Comprehensive Lab Tests, Doctor Insights & Clinician Summaries, Lifetime Results Tracking, Nationwide Testing Access, Early Disease Detection | Not published |
Function Health vs Nest Genomics: common questions
Which is better, Function Health or Nest Genomics?
On our 0-100 score Function Health rates higher (55/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Function Health and Nest Genomics compare on the numbers?
Function Health leads on our overall score (55/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 31/100), domain rating (71/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($298M against $8.5M). Nest Genomics leads on headcount (16 against 7), LinkedIn following (1,969 against 152).
Read the full Function Health review and pricing or the Nest Genomics review and pricing. You can also browse other Function Health alternatives we track.