Function Health vs InsideTracker
Function Health vs InsideTracker, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Function Health is on 55/100 and InsideTracker on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Function Health
- funding raised: $298M against $45.0M
InsideTracker
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 54 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 18,119 against 152
At a glance
| Measure | Function Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Membership-based service offering 160+ lab tests, doctor insights, and lifetime health tracking. | Personalized health and performance insights based on blood biomarkers and DNA. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Longevity, Precision Medicine | HealthTech, Longevity, Genomics, Biotech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Function Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 54 |
| Total funding | $298M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $3K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 152 | 18,119 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Function Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Function Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Svelte, Astro | Next.js |
| Analytics | Mixpanel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Function Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Comprehensive Lab Tests, Doctor Insights & Clinician Summaries, Lifetime Results Tracking, Nationwide Testing Access, Early Disease Detection | Not published |
Function Health vs InsideTracker: common questions
Which is better, Function Health or InsideTracker?
On our 0-100 score InsideTracker rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Function Health and InsideTracker compare on the numbers?
Function Health leads on funding raised ($298M against $45.0M). InsideTracker leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 45/100), headcount (54 against 7), LinkedIn following (18,119 against 152).
Read the full Function Health review and pricing or the InsideTracker review and pricing. You can also browse other Function Health alternatives we track.