Function Health vs Human Longevity
Function Health vs Human Longevity, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Function Health is on 55/100 and Human Longevity on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Function Health
- domain rating: 71/100 against 57/100
Human Longevity
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 79 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 29,956 against 152
At a glance
| Measure | Function Health | Human Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Membership-based service offering 160+ lab tests, doctor insights, and lifetime health tracking. | Genomics and AI-driven health intelligence company focused on extending healthy human life. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Longevity, Precision Medicine | HealthTech, Biotech, Genomics, Longevity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | San Diego, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Function Health | Human Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 79 |
| Total funding | $298M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $3K | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 152 | 29,956 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Function Health | Human Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Function Health | Human Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Svelte, Astro | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Mixpanel | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Function Health | Human Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Comprehensive Lab Tests, Doctor Insights & Clinician Summaries, Lifetime Results Tracking, Nationwide Testing Access, Early Disease Detection | Not published |
Function Health vs Human Longevity: common questions
Which is better, Function Health or Human Longevity?
On our 0-100 score Human Longevity rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Function Health and Human Longevity compare on the numbers?
Function Health leads on domain rating (71/100 against 57/100). Human Longevity leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100), headcount (79 against 7), LinkedIn following (29,956 against 152).
Read the full Function Health review and pricing or the Human Longevity review and pricing. You can also browse other Function Health alternatives we track.