Function Health vs Grundium
Function Health vs Grundium, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Function Health is on 55/100 and Grundium on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Function Health
- domain rating: 71/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $298M against $48.0M
Grundium
- our overall score: 71/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 89 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 8,549 against 152
At a glance
| Measure | Function Health | Grundium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Membership-based service offering 160+ lab tests, doctor insights, and lifetime health tracking. | Digital pathology imaging technology and AI-driven precision pathology software. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Longevity, Precision Medicine | HealthTech, Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | Tampere, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Function Health | Grundium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 89 |
| Total funding | $298M | $48.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $3K | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 152 | 8,549 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Function Health | Grundium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 71/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Function Health | Grundium |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Svelte, Astro | Not detected |
| Analytics | Mixpanel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Function Health | Grundium |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Comprehensive Lab Tests, Doctor Insights & Clinician Summaries, Lifetime Results Tracking, Nationwide Testing Access, Early Disease Detection | Not published |
Function Health vs Grundium: common questions
Which is better, Function Health or Grundium?
On our 0-100 score Grundium rates higher (71/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Function Health and Grundium compare on the numbers?
Function Health leads on domain rating (71/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($298M against $48.0M). Grundium leads on our overall score (71/100 against 55/100), headcount (89 against 7), LinkedIn following (8,549 against 152).
Read the full Function Health review and pricing or the Grundium review and pricing. You can also browse other Function Health alternatives we track.