FullContact vs Lusha
FullContact vs Lusha, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FullContact is on 57/100 and Lusha on 70/100.
Where each one leads
FullContact
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 358 against 61
- headcount growth: +3.7% against -17.4%
- funding raised: $245M against $42.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 11,866
At a glance
| Measure | FullContact | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity resolution platform that unifies and enriches customer data for businesses. | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Data Enrichment, Identity Resolution | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Denver, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FullContact | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 61 | 358 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.4% | +3.7% |
| Total funding | $42.0M | $245M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,866 | 66,037 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FullContact | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 52/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FullContact | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
FullContact vs Lusha: common questions
Which is better, FullContact or Lusha?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FullContact and Lusha compare on the numbers?
Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), headcount (358 against 61), headcount growth (+3.7% against -17.4%), funding raised ($245M against $42.0M), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 11,866).
Read the full FullContact review and pricing or the Lusha review and pricing. You can also browse other FullContact alternatives we track.