Freenome vs NanoStruct
Freenome vs NanoStruct, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Freenome is on 59/100 and NanoStruct on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Freenome
- our overall score: 59/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 402 against 15
- funding raised: $570M against $2.9M
- LinkedIn following: 46,860 against 1,974
NanoStruct
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Freenome | NanoStruct |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Freenome is a biotechnology company developing a multi-cancer early detection blood test using machine learning and biology. | Develops nanostructured sensor chips for rapid pathogen identification in food. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Biotech | Biotechnology, Food Technology, Nanotechnology, Diagnostics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | South San Francisco, USA | Würzburg, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Freenome | NanoStruct |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 402 | 15 |
| Total funding | $570M | $2.9M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 46,860 | 1,974 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Freenome | NanoStruct |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Freenome | NanoStruct |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Freenome vs NanoStruct: common questions
Which is better, Freenome or NanoStruct?
On our 0-100 score Freenome rates higher (59/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Freenome and NanoStruct compare on the numbers?
Freenome leads on our overall score (59/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 22/100), domain rating (56/100 against 24/100), headcount (402 against 15), funding raised ($570M against $2.9M), LinkedIn following (46,860 against 1,974).
Read the full Freenome review and pricing or the NanoStruct review and pricing. You can also browse other Freenome alternatives we track.