Freenome vs HistoSonics
Freenome vs HistoSonics, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Freenome is on 59/100 and HistoSonics on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Freenome
- our overall score: 59/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 48/100
- funding raised: $570M against $140M
HistoSonics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Freenome | HistoSonics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Freenome is a biotechnology company developing a multi-cancer early detection blood test using machine learning and biology. | Developing a new histotripsy therapeutic platform for cancer treatment. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Biotech | Biotechnology, Medical Devices, HealthTech, Oncology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | Not published |
| Headquarters | South San Francisco, USA | Minneapolis, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Freenome | HistoSonics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 402 | Not published |
| Total funding | $570M | $140M |
| Latest round | Series D | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 46,860 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Freenome | HistoSonics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Freenome | HistoSonics |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Freenome | HistoSonics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Tumor-destroying soundwaves receive FDA approval for liver treatment in humans. The US FDA has approved HistoSonics to market a liver cancer treatment using histotripsy, an ultrasound-based technology developed at the University of Michigan”r/STEW_ScTecEngWorld
Freenome vs HistoSonics: common questions
Which is better, Freenome or HistoSonics?
On our 0-100 score Freenome rates higher (59/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Freenome and HistoSonics compare on the numbers?
Freenome leads on our overall score (59/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 37/100), domain rating (56/100 against 48/100), funding raised ($570M against $140M).
What do real users say about Freenome and HistoSonics?
HistoSonics: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/STEW_ScTecEngWorld.
Read the full Freenome review and pricing or the HistoSonics review and pricing. You can also browse other Freenome alternatives we track.