Freenome vs Guardant Health
Freenome vs Guardant Health, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Freenome is on 59/100 and Guardant Health on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Freenome
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Guardant Health
- domain rating: 71/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 4,663 against 402
- funding raised: $900M against $570M
- LinkedIn following: 274,951 against 46,860
At a glance
| Measure | Freenome | Guardant Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Freenome is a biotechnology company developing a multi-cancer early detection blood test using machine learning and biology. | Guardant Health is a precision oncology company that develops and commercializes liquid biopsy tests for cancer detection, recurrence monitoring, and treatment selection. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Biotech | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | South San Francisco, USA | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Freenome | Guardant Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 402 | 4,663 |
| Total funding | $570M | $900M |
| Latest round | Series D | Post IPO |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 46,860 | 274,951 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Freenome | Guardant Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Freenome | Guardant Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Freenome vs Guardant Health: common questions
Which is better, Freenome or Guardant Health?
On our 0-100 score Freenome rates higher (59/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Freenome and Guardant Health compare on the numbers?
Guardant Health leads on domain rating (71/100 against 56/100), headcount (4,663 against 402), funding raised ($900M against $570M), LinkedIn following (274,951 against 46,860).
Read the full Freenome review and pricing or the Guardant Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Freenome alternatives we track.