Freenome vs Graph Therapeutics
Freenome vs Graph Therapeutics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Freenome is on 59/100 and Graph Therapeutics on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Freenome
- our overall score: 59/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $570M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 46,860 against 2,302
Graph Therapeutics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Freenome | Graph Therapeutics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Freenome is a biotechnology company developing a multi-cancer early detection blood test using machine learning and biology. | Developing precision medicines for inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases using AI and patient sample analysis. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Biotech | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | South San Francisco, USA | Boston, Austria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Freenome | Graph Therapeutics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 402 | Not published |
| Total funding | $570M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 46,860 | 2,302 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Freenome | Graph Therapeutics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 33/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Freenome | Graph Therapeutics |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Freenome vs Graph Therapeutics: common questions
Which is better, Freenome or Graph Therapeutics?
On our 0-100 score Freenome rates higher (59/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Freenome and Graph Therapeutics compare on the numbers?
Freenome leads on our overall score (59/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 41/100), domain rating (57/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($570M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (46,860 against 2,302).
Read the full Freenome review and pricing or the Graph Therapeutics review and pricing. You can also browse other Freenome alternatives we track.