FREDsense vs SupPlant
FREDsense vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FREDsense is on 53/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
FREDsense
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 55 against 35
- funding raised: $62.9M against $9.5M
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 2,877
At a glance
| Measure | FREDsense | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | FREDsense provides rapid, field-deployable biosensor technology for real-time water quality testing, specializing in PFAS detection. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | AgTech, Water Treatment, Environmental Monitoring, Biosensors | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, software, services | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Calgary, Canada | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FREDsense | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $9.5M | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,877 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FREDsense | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FREDsense | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
FREDsense vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, FREDsense or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FREDsense and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), headcount (55 against 35), funding raised ($62.9M against $9.5M), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 2,877).
Read the full FREDsense review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other FREDsense alternatives we track.