Fraud.net vs ThetaRay
Fraud.net vs ThetaRay, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fraud.net is on 53/100 and ThetaRay on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Fraud.net
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 53/100
ThetaRay
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 257 against 64
- funding raised: $148M against $2.2M
- LinkedIn following: 19,846 against 9,478
At a glance
| Measure | Fraud.net | ThetaRay |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven platform for real-time fraud detection, risk management, and compliance. | AI-powered transaction monitoring for fintech and banks to enable trusted cross-border payments. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Fintech, Cybersecurity, IoT, SCADA |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fraud.net | ThetaRay |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 257 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +23.1% |
| Total funding | $2.2M | $148M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,478 | 19,846 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fraud.net | ThetaRay |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fraud.net | ThetaRay |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Fraud.net | ThetaRay |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Fraud.net's AI and Machine Learning Models offers an extensive range of solutions aimed at fraud detection and prevention. Leaning heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning including deep learning and neural networks in combin”r/FutureTechFinds
“Prior to co-founding ThetaRay, Gazit served as a Managing Director of NICE Cyber & Intelligence Solutions. He was also previously Group President & CEO of SkyVision, and held executive roles at leading companies including Deltathree, NetVis”r/SmallCapStocks
Fraud.net vs ThetaRay: common questions
Which is better, Fraud.net or ThetaRay?
On our 0-100 score ThetaRay rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fraud.net and ThetaRay compare on the numbers?
Fraud.net leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), domain rating (68/100 against 53/100). ThetaRay leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), headcount (257 against 64), funding raised ($148M against $2.2M), LinkedIn following (19,846 against 9,478).
What do real users say about Fraud.net and ThetaRay?
Fraud.net: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FutureTechFinds. ThetaRay: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/SmallCapStocks.
Read the full Fraud.net review and pricing or the ThetaRay review and pricing. You can also browse other Fraud.net alternatives we track.