Fraud.net vs Sardine
Fraud.net vs Sardine, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fraud.net is on 53/100 and Sardine on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Fraud.net
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Sardine
- our overall score: 71/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 331 against 64
- funding raised: $25.0M against $2.2M
- LinkedIn following: 53,578 against 9,478
At a glance
| Measure | Fraud.net | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven platform for real-time fraud detection, risk management, and compliance. | AI-powered risk platform for fraud prevention, compliance, and credit underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Fintech, Payments, Fraud Detection, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fraud.net | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 331 |
| Total funding | $2.2M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C Extension |
| Valuation | Not published | $660M |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,478 | 53,578 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fraud.net | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fraud.net | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Fraud.net | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Fraud.net's AI and Machine Learning Models offers an extensive range of solutions aimed at fraud detection and prevention. Leaning heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning including deep learning and neural networks in combin”r/FutureTechFinds
Fraud.net vs Sardine: common questions
Which is better, Fraud.net or Sardine?
On our 0-100 score Sardine rates higher (71/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fraud.net and Sardine compare on the numbers?
Sardine leads on our overall score (71/100 against 53/100), headcount (331 against 64), funding raised ($25.0M against $2.2M), LinkedIn following (53,578 against 9,478).
What do real users say about Fraud.net and Sardine?
Fraud.net: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FutureTechFinds.
Read the full Fraud.net review and pricing or the Sardine review and pricing. You can also browse other Fraud.net alternatives we track.