Fraud.net vs Riskified
Fraud.net vs Riskified, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fraud.net is on 53/100 and Riskified on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Fraud.net
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 41/100
Riskified
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 748 against 64
- funding raised: $229M against $2.2M
- LinkedIn following: 67,837 against 9,478
At a glance
| Measure | Fraud.net | Riskified |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven platform for real-time fraud detection, risk management, and compliance. | Riskified empowers businesses to grow eCommerce revenues and profit by mitigating risk and fighting fraud. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Fintech, Fraud Prevention, Merchant, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fraud.net | Riskified |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 748 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.3% |
| Total funding | $2.2M | $229M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,478 | 67,837 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fraud.net | Riskified |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fraud.net | Riskified |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Fraud.net | Riskified |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | 5 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Fraud.net's AI and Machine Learning Models offers an extensive range of solutions aimed at fraud detection and prevention. Leaning heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning including deep learning and neural networks in combin”r/FutureTechFinds
“Return Abuse Goes Mainstream as Nearly Half of Consumers Use AI in Return Claims, New Riskified Research Finds.”r/Quantisnow
Fraud.net vs Riskified: common questions
Which is better, Fraud.net or Riskified?
On our 0-100 score Riskified rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fraud.net and Riskified compare on the numbers?
Fraud.net leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 41/100). Riskified leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), domain rating (76/100 against 68/100), headcount (748 against 64), funding raised ($229M against $2.2M), LinkedIn following (67,837 against 9,478).
What do real users say about Fraud.net and Riskified?
Fraud.net: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FutureTechFinds. Riskified: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Fraud.net review and pricing or the Riskified review and pricing. You can also browse other Fraud.net alternatives we track.