Francis Medical vs Shockwave Medical
Francis Medical vs Shockwave Medical, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Francis Medical is on 51/100 and Shockwave Medical on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Francis Medical
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Shockwave Medical
- our overall score: 66/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 1,542 against 71
- funding raised: $200M against $156M
At a glance
| Measure | Francis Medical | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. | Develops intravascular lithotripsy technology for treating calcified cardiovascular lesions. |
| Category | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Cardiovascular Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Maple Grove, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Francis Medical | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 71 | 1,542 |
| Total funding | $156M | $200M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 120,592 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Francis Medical | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Francis Medical | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Francis Medical vs Shockwave Medical: common questions
Which is better, Francis Medical or Shockwave Medical?
On our 0-100 score Shockwave Medical rates higher (66/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Francis Medical and Shockwave Medical compare on the numbers?
Shockwave Medical leads on our overall score (66/100 against 51/100), domain rating (59/100 against 27/100), headcount (1,542 against 71), funding raised ($200M against $156M).
Read the full Francis Medical review and pricing or the Shockwave Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other Francis Medical alternatives we track.