Francis Medical vs NeuroPace
Francis Medical vs NeuroPace, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Francis Medical is on 51/100 and NeuroPace on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Francis Medical
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NeuroPace
- our overall score: 67/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 248 against 71
- funding raised: $475M against $156M
At a glance
| Measure | Francis Medical | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. | Develops a brain-computer interface for treating epilepsy. |
| Category | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices | MedTech, HealthTech, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Maple Grove, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Francis Medical | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 71 | 248 |
| Total funding | $156M | $475M |
| Latest round | Series C | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $375M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 32,261 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Francis Medical | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Francis Medical | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
Francis Medical vs NeuroPace: common questions
Which is better, Francis Medical or NeuroPace?
On our 0-100 score NeuroPace rates higher (67/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Francis Medical and NeuroPace compare on the numbers?
NeuroPace leads on our overall score (67/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), domain rating (53/100 against 27/100), headcount (248 against 71), funding raised ($475M against $156M).
Read the full Francis Medical review and pricing or the NeuroPace review and pricing. You can also browse other Francis Medical alternatives we track.