Francis Medical vs mediQ
Francis Medical vs mediQ, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Francis Medical is on 51/100 and mediQ on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Francis Medical
- funding raised: $156M against $7.8M
mediQ
- our overall score: 54/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 1,372 against 71
At a glance
| Measure | Francis Medical | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. | Global healthcare and homecare partner providing medical devices, products, and innovative solutions. |
| Category | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Homecare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Maple Grove, United States | Utrecht, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Francis Medical | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 71 | 1,372 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -11.1% |
| Total funding | $156M | $7.8M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 30,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Francis Medical | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Francis Medical | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Google Tag Manager |
Francis Medical vs mediQ: common questions
Which is better, Francis Medical or mediQ?
On our 0-100 score mediQ rates higher (54/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Francis Medical and mediQ compare on the numbers?
Francis Medical leads on funding raised ($156M against $7.8M). mediQ leads on our overall score (54/100 against 51/100), domain rating (38/100 against 27/100), headcount (1,372 against 71).
Read the full Francis Medical review and pricing or the mediQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Francis Medical alternatives we track.