Francis Medical vs iCAD
Francis Medical vs iCAD, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Francis Medical is on 51/100 and iCAD on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Francis Medical
- funding raised: $156M against $37.5M
iCAD
- our overall score: 55/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 353 against 71
At a glance
| Measure | Francis Medical | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. | AI-powered cancer detection and therapy solutions for early diagnosis and personalized risk assessment. |
| Category | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Maple Grove, United States | Nashua, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Francis Medical | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 71 | 353 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +26.6% |
| Total funding | $156M | $37.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Direct Offering |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,268 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Francis Medical | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Francis Medical | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo | Not detected |
Francis Medical vs iCAD: common questions
Which is better, Francis Medical or iCAD?
On our 0-100 score iCAD rates higher (55/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Francis Medical and iCAD compare on the numbers?
Francis Medical leads on funding raised ($156M against $37.5M). iCAD leads on our overall score (55/100 against 51/100), domain rating (53/100 against 27/100), headcount (353 against 71).
Read the full Francis Medical review and pricing or the iCAD review and pricing. You can also browse other Francis Medical alternatives we track.