Foursquare vs Sitewise Analytics
Foursquare vs Sitewise Analytics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Foursquare is on 68/100 and Sitewise Analytics on 22/100.
Where each one leads
Foursquare
- our overall score: 68/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 525 against 44
- LinkedIn following: 89,590 against 1,573
Sitewise Analytics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Foursquare | Sitewise Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Location intelligence platform providing geospatial data and tools for businesses. | Elevating site selection and market planning for multi-unit brands with sophisticated solutions and simple software. |
| Category | Location Intelligence, Geospatial Data, Data Platform, MarTech | Location Intelligence, Site Selection, Market Planning, Retail Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Foursquare | Sitewise Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 525 | 44 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $334M | Not published |
| Latest round | Late Stage | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 89,590 | 1,573 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Foursquare | Sitewise Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 17/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 5/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Foursquare | Sitewise Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Foursquare | Sitewise Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 2.0/5 from 1 vote |
Foursquare vs Sitewise Analytics: common questions
Which is better, Foursquare or Sitewise Analytics?
On our 0-100 score Foursquare rates higher (68/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Foursquare and Sitewise Analytics compare on the numbers?
Foursquare leads on our overall score (68/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 35/100), domain rating (91/100 against 38/100), headcount (525 against 44), LinkedIn following (89,590 against 1,573).
Read the full Foursquare review and pricing or the Sitewise Analytics review and pricing. You can also browse other Foursquare alternatives we track.