Foursquare vs SafeGraph
Foursquare vs SafeGraph, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Foursquare is on 68/100 and SafeGraph on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Foursquare
- our overall score: 68/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 72/100
- funding raised: $334M against $45.0M
SafeGraph
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Foursquare | SafeGraph |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Location intelligence platform providing geospatial data and tools for businesses. | Provides accurate, curated data on physical places for geospatial analytics and location-based applications. |
| Category | Location Intelligence, Geospatial Data, Data Platform, MarTech | Data as a Service, Geospatial Analytics, Location Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Foursquare | SafeGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 525 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $334M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Late Stage | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $370M |
| LinkedIn followers | 89,590 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Foursquare | SafeGraph |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Foursquare | SafeGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Foursquare vs SafeGraph: common questions
Which is better, Foursquare or SafeGraph?
On our 0-100 score Foursquare rates higher (68/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Foursquare and SafeGraph compare on the numbers?
Foursquare leads on our overall score (68/100 against 49/100), domain rating (91/100 against 72/100), funding raised ($334M against $45.0M). SafeGraph leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 46/100).
Read the full Foursquare review and pricing or the SafeGraph review and pricing. You can also browse other Foursquare alternatives we track.