Foursquare vs PlaceSense
Foursquare vs PlaceSense, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Foursquare is on 68/100 and PlaceSense on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Foursquare
- our overall score: 68/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 525 against 4
- headcount growth: +5.7% against -32.3%
- funding raised: $334M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 89,590 against 2,003
PlaceSense
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Foursquare | PlaceSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Location intelligence platform providing geospatial data and tools for businesses. | Location analytics platform providing real-time insights on people's movement and behavior. |
| Category | Location Intelligence, Geospatial Data, Data Platform, MarTech | Location Intelligence, Big Data, Data Analytics, Retail |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Foursquare | PlaceSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 525 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.7% | -32.3% |
| Total funding | $334M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Late Stage | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $13.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 89,590 | 2,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Foursquare | PlaceSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Foursquare | PlaceSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Htmx, Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Foursquare vs PlaceSense: common questions
Which is better, Foursquare or PlaceSense?
On our 0-100 score Foursquare rates higher (68/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Foursquare and PlaceSense compare on the numbers?
Foursquare leads on our overall score (68/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 30/100), domain rating (91/100 against 34/100), headcount (525 against 4), headcount growth (+5.7% against -32.3%), funding raised ($334M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (89,590 against 2,003).
Read the full Foursquare review and pricing or the PlaceSense review and pricing. You can also browse other Foursquare alternatives we track.