Foursquare vs Juxta
Foursquare vs Juxta, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Foursquare is on 68/100 and Juxta on 34/100.
Where each one leads
Foursquare
- our overall score: 68/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 525 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 89,590 against 1,137
Juxta
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Foursquare | Juxta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Location intelligence platform providing geospatial data and tools for businesses. | Juxta is building the first Universal Positioning System (UPS), a GPS alternative that offers universal, hardware-free, and offline positioning. |
| Category | Location Intelligence, Geospatial Data, Data Platform, MarTech | Location Intelligence, Positioning Systems, Machine Learning, Synthetic Data Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Foursquare | Juxta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 525 | 8 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $334M | Not published |
| Latest round | Late Stage | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 89,590 | 1,137 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Foursquare | Juxta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Foursquare | Juxta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Foursquare | Juxta |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Universal Positioning System, Hardware-Free Deployment, Offline & Unjammable Capability, Remote Deployability, Cost-Effective & Scalable, Versatile Tracking Applications |
Foursquare vs Juxta: common questions
Which is better, Foursquare or Juxta?
On our 0-100 score Foursquare rates higher (68/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Foursquare and Juxta compare on the numbers?
Foursquare leads on our overall score (68/100 against 34/100), domain rating (91/100 against 32/100), headcount (525 against 8), LinkedIn following (89,590 against 1,137).
Read the full Foursquare review and pricing or the Juxta review and pricing. You can also browse other Foursquare alternatives we track.